Okay. There really isn’t just one single concept of bisexual, plus it undoubtedly does not suggest an individual who dates/enjoys both women and men similarly and has now dropped in love with men and women. You will find bisexuals that have just dated one gender, or only have dropped deeply in love with one sex, and they’re still bisexual! Additionally there are a lot of people that do have choice ( e.g. is sexually drawn to males, but get the the greater part of those insufferable and don’t like currently them, or homoromantic that is bisexual which will be the way I often describe myself), which can be fine! I would personally additionally want to see Waverly continue steadily to define by by herself and make use of more terms to explain what/how she identifies, however in the meantime We don’t think that simply because she appears more (romantically) into Nicole than she had been into Champ/her AU fiance, that that always means she’s clearly gay. In addition believe that the throwaway line into the AU episode, that was played for laughs and I also saw a lot more of a Buffy guide than other things, is fundamentally the end-all free big tit cams that is be-all regards to her identity.
I do believe it is fine for gay/lesbian individuals to claim her, but In addition think it is a shitty that is little all of the people into the commentary to whine about other people claiming Waverly as bi.
I’m honestly confused regarding your “more than one definition that is” of term bisexual. I’m additionally unsure just just how which also relates to Waverly. Then there’s nothing for you to go on about her being bisexual & I guarantee you don’t add her to this list if she had never been with Champ. Any list who has Waverly as bisexual is determining her sex by her past. You basically admitted by saying you hope she identifies by herself more that you’re merely guessing at her bisexuality. I believe that is what folks have problem with. There’s a difference that is big fans in the home viewing the show “claiming” her as bi/gay & her being added to some list like this that looks official. Fans glance at a listing such as this that’s published & shared one of the fandom & simply assume it to be true & it results in confusion. We additionally don’t see what’s shitty about individuals having concern over it. It’s a problem. In case a canon bisexual character had been on a summary of lesbian characters I’d feel the way that is same.
So unless it is been stated by the show/character, possibly keep these type of figures from the lists for the present time & perhaps have another TBD list.
Sorry for the reply that is late. I became replying especially to Mazz stating that Bo represents “the concept of a bisexual woman” because “not only did she never hesitate inside her real attraction for and satisfaction of both men and women, but once she fell deeply in love with both a male and a lady she enjoyed them similarly.” I became attempting to make clear that, while which could extremely very well be *the* concept of one person’s bisexuality, it is not always the scenario that all those elements must certanly be contained in purchase for anyone to be bisexual. Bisexual doesn’t constantly seem like being similarly interested in women and men along with falling in love (and loving equally) “a male and a lady.” Individuals define and describe their bisexuality in various means, and it might be “sexually drawn to both women and men but mostly dropping in deep love with ladies,” for instance. It might also be “sexually interested in every person, irrespective of sex, while having only dropped in deep love with females and people that are non-binary the last, but could conceivably fall deeply in love with a guy.” Does which make feeling? I recently wished to counter the concept that there clearly was precisely one good way to embody or express the meaning of bisexuality, for fictional figures or even for us real-live humans.